Entry From
Flora of Tropical East Africa, page 1, (1996) Author: B. VERDCOURT & F.G. DAVIES
Names
PTAEROXYLON obliquum (Thunb.) Radlk. [family PTAEROXYLACEAE], in Sitz.-Ber. Bayer. Akad. 20: 165 (1890); Gürke in P.O.A. C: 232 (1895); Siebenl., Forstw. Deutsch-Ostafr.: 98 (1914); V.E. 3(1): 800, t. 376 (1915); Chalk & Burtt Davy, For. Trees & Timbers Brit. Emp. 3: 56, fig. 8, t. 11 (1935); Harms in E. & P. Pf., ed. 2, 19b1: 48 (1940); T.T.C.L.: 318 (1949); Gomes e Sousa, Dendrol. Moçamb. 2: 114 (1949) & Dendrol. Moçamb. 1: 196, photo. & fig. (1951); Exell & Mendonça, C.F.A. 1: 306 (1951); F. White & Styles in F.Z. 2: 548, t. 118 (1966); Palmer & Pitman, Trees Southern Afr. 2: 1373, photos. (1973); F. White & Styles in F.S.A. 18(3): 35, fig. 9, map 34 (1986); Iversen in Symb. Bot. Upsal. 29(3): 203 (1991). Type: South Africa, no material originally cited but specimen, Thunberg (UPS-THUN)
Rhus obliqua Thunb. [family ANACARDIACEAE], Fl. Cap. 2: 224 (1818); DC., Prodr. 2: 68 (1825)
Ptaeroxylon utile Eckl. & Zeyh. [family PTAEROXYLACEAE], Enum. Pl. Afr. Austr.: 54 (1834); Harv., Thes. Cap. 1: 11, t. 17 (1859); Sond. in Fl. Cap. 1: 243 (1860); Sim, For. & For. Fl. Col. Cape Good Hope: 166, t. 31 (1907). Type: S. Africa, in forests by the Bushman’s R., and in the districts of Addo and Coega (Uitenhage), Ecklon (K, OXF, isosyn.!)
Distribution
TANZANIA Lushoto District W. Usambara Mts., Sunga–Manolo road, 26 May 1953, Drummond & Hemsley 2774! & Langwi, 20 Dec. 1929, Ross 593! & Kwambugu area, Holst & without exact locality, D.F.O. Lushoto A23/65!
Notes
The wood is incredibly durable and outlasts metal when used for machine bearings. It was once of great importance in South Africa being strong, handsome, capable of a fine polish and resembling mahogany but difficult to work. It was formerly much used for house-building, fencing poles and telegraph poles. How much it was used in East Africa is not known; Siebenlist deals with the species in his book on forestry in Tanzania and the Kishambaa name ‘Mwandara’ was widely known. Engler (V.E. 3(1): 800 (1915)) stated that it was desirable this useful tree was cultivated by forestry departments.