Entry From
FZ, Vol 8, Part 3, page 43, (1988) Author: O. M. Hilliard and B. L. Burtt
Names
Streptocarpus Lindl. [family GESNERIACEAE], in Bot. Reg. 14 tab. 1173 (1828).—Hilliard & Burtt, Streptocarpus: An African Plant Study (1971).
Range
A genus of about 135 species in Africa, Madagascar and E. Asia, but the four Asiatic species are doubtfully congeneric.
Notes
Streptocarpus is divisible into two subgenera: subgen. Streptocarpus comprising acaulescent species (there are a few exceptions), which develop an abscission layer towards the base of the lamina during the unfavourable season and have the peduncles arising from the base of the lamina or from the petiolode; and subgen. Streptocarpella K. Fritsch, comprising caulescent species, which lack radical leaves; the cauline leaves have no abscission layer and the peduncles are axillary. The subgenera are also separated by a difference in chromosome number: 2n = 32 in subgen. Streptocarpus, 2n = 30 in subgen. Streptocarpella. subgen. Streptocarpella is represented in the area of Flora Zambesiaca only by S. buchananii; all the other species in this area belong to subgen Streptocarpus and are strictly acaulescent with the exception of S. myoporoides.In a revision of the whole genus (Hilliard & Burtt 1971) an aggregate species concept was employed where necessary to give a loose linkage between very closely allied species whose reduction to subspecific rank would scarcely have been warranted and would have led to an unnecessarily cumbersome nomenclature.Two such aggregate species are represented in the Flora Zambesiaca area. S. agg. cooperi (based on the Natal species S. cooperi C.B.Cl.) includes from our area S. grandis, S. michelmorei and S. solenanthus; S. agg. monophyllus (based on the Angolan S. monophyllus Welw.) includes S. eylesii, S. wittei and S. arcuatus.This aggregate species concept is not included in the formal presentation of the Flora account, but it is as well to remind the user that it has been found necessary. In some cases the component species of these aggregates may not be easy to distinguish.The occurrence of wild hybrids may be a source of difficulty in naming specimens, particularly in the eastern highlands of Zimbabwe and in adjoining Mozambique (see Hilliard & Burtt 1971, pp. 91–92). Hybrids are likely both within and between the two aggregate species mentioned above; otherwise S. umtaliensis is the only species that is at all likely to be involved and the evidence here is very slight. Individual instances are mentioned under the species concerned. It can only be emphasised that when a plant or population seems to vary from the typical form of its species an attempt to relate this to characters of other species present in the area is always worth while.