Entry for MELHANIA denhamii R. Br. [family STERCULIACEAE]
Entry From
Flora Somalia, Vol 2, (1999) Author: by M. Thulin [updated by M. Thulin 2008]
Names
MELHANIA denhamii R. Br. [family STERCULIACEAE], (1826). Fig. 12 E–G.
MELHANIA denhamii Chiov. var. benadirensis [family STERCULIACEAE], Fl. Somala 1: 103 (1929);. type: C2, between “Avorrei” and “Bulo Burti”, Puccioni & Stefanini 174 (FT holo.).
MELHANIA latibracteolata Dorr [family STERCULIACEAE], (2007).
MELHANIA praemorsa Dorr [family STERCULIACEAE], (2007).
Notes
Durod (Som.). M. denhamii is here taken in a broader sense than in Fl. Eth. 2(2) (1995) and includes “ M. sp. = Hemming 1465” and “ M. sp. = Friis et al. 2971”. These two preliminary taxa were described as, respectively, M. praemorsa and M. latibracteolata, both with types from Ethiopia, by Dorr in Fl. Trop. E. Afr. (2007). M. praemorsa was keyed out from M. latibracteolata by having leaves three times as long as wide and with margin entire or denticulate only in the upper half, young stems canescent (as opposed to lanate, whitish tomentose), and seeds with an umbonate projection. However, in the description of M. praemorsa the young stems were said to be “whitish tomentose to canescent or lanate”, and in the description of M. latibracteolata the seeds were said to have “an umbonate projection” despite the statement to the contrary in the key. How M. latibracteolata is to be distinguished from M. denhamii was not mentioned at all. The variation, particularly in leaf shape and shape and size of the epicalyx bracts, is striking, but seems continuous at a broader scale even if local forms sometimes may be distinguished. However, the characters are not always correlated in the way stated by Dorr in Fl. Trop. E. Afr. (2007). For example, Thulin 5652 from central Somalia has leaves more than three times as long as wide that are dentate almost to the base. Therefore, I still prefer to treat these forms as a single variable species.